![]() He is taking their health care, he'll cut, services, there's issues of access to education, accessibility, the ADA. That Trump is seriously dangerous to disabled people. That it's easier to empathize, or to pity, disabled people, than it is to look at the fact that Trump had already said that there should be a registry for Muslims, which is what he was defending, when he mocked Serge Kovaleski. when he said that Mexicans were rapists, that disabled people is a more palatable group to rally around and protect, as long as you don't actually have to know what the issues that affect them are. Now a lot of people, when they were polled during the election, pointed to that moment, of Trump mocking Kovaleski, and said that was the most disturbing thing about the entire campaign. It never specified who was celebrating, how many people were celebrating, or whether those allegations had actually proven to be true.ĭonald Trump mocked reporter Serge Kovaleski because Kovaleski disproved Trump's statement that Muslims celebrated after the 9/11 attacks. That's the part of the story that everybody forgets to talk about, the fact that Kovaleski was fact-checking Trump's claims that Muslims were celebrating as the towers were coming down in 9/11.Įxactly, because Trump used Kovaleski's piece, which literally just says that police interviewed some people about allegations that people were celebrating in 9/11. "So, clearly he was speaking to power already, and then people got so angry at that moment, that they've been silencing him right along with Trump, ever since." - Kim Sauder ![]() So, clearly he was speaking to power already, and then people got so angry at that moment, that they've been silencing him right along with Trump, ever since. So, Serge Kovaleski lost his name, and became "that disabled reporter" that Streep very clearly said had no privilege, power, or ability to fight back, even though the whole reason that the mocking took place at all is because Serge Kovaleski fact-checked Trump. And she's been playing on what has become a very iconic moment, and a very iconic narrative, that was created by outsiders of that moment. Well Streep didn't do that, the media's been doing that since the incident happened. So Trump mocked him, but in a sense Streep just sort of labelled him "the disabled reporter"? It doesn't look at what really happened in that instant when Donald Trump was mocking Serge Kovaleski, it doesn't look at the actual impact of what that means for disabled people, it just uses it as a way to further a separate political agenda. The problem with Meryl Streep's speech is that it reduces Serge Kovaleski, and by extension, other disabled people, to an object for the purpose of furthering a separate political agenda. What was the problem with Meryl Streep's speech? According to Politico, a representative for the New York Times said, "We think it's outrageous that he would ridicule the appearance of one of our reporters.Kim Sauder blogs and tweets as "Crippled Scholar." She's also completing a PhD in Critical Disability Studies at York University. Kovaleski has arthrogryposis, a rare musculoskeletal disorder that restricts his arms' range of movement. I don't remember,'" Trump told the crowd in South Carolina while making gestures with his arms that look like he's making fun of Kovaleski's disability. Trump's exact words, per the footage below, were: "Now the poor guy, you ought to see the guy, 'Uh I don't know what I said. Many people were none too pleased with Trump's impression of the reporter. 11 terrorist attacks in the United States that Trump disagreed with. The journalist Trump mocked, Serge Kovaleski, now writes for the Times but in 2001 wrote a story for the Washington Post about the Sept. During a speech Tuesday in South Carolina, business tycoon and presidential hopeful Donald Trump did an impression of a disabled New York Times reporter that many are calling highly offensive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |